March 22,2009
You have to give the Wall Street thugs their due. Whenever they seem to have plunged all of us into bankruptcy, they just come up with something new to drain the last few drops of liquidity.
I remember the 90’s. I got a truly unbelievable call from my broker at one of the “big” name brand investment banks. He had a story that was too good to be true. He had an investment, a fund that was being put together for very special clients like me, that was just flat guaranteed. It seems that they had bought an insurance policy to insure against the investment going down. So if it went up, we collected the profit. If it went down, we simply made a claim against the insurance policy.
I remember this discussion vividly, especially how crestfallen he was when I rejected the idea. My words to him were “find out how to short that insurance company and I’ll buy into that.” Shorting, as you undoubtedly know, means you think the price will go down.
Turns out, of course, that there was no insurance company to short, no insurance policy, and it wasn’t appropriate for small investors like me to worry ourselves about such things. That was my introduction to credit default swaps, the “financial weapons of mass destruction” as Warren Buffet described it. The non-insurance policy insurance policy was attached to a large, reputable insurance group to lend credibility to the scam. The Credit Modernization Act of 1999, signed by President Clinton, assured that the regulators would be shown the door. The head of the Chicago commodities board quit over it.
Now that the scam has come out of the closet, with some estimates as high as $600 Trillion, (yes that was a “T”) we can all have a good laugh and start over. Provided of course that they print enough money to make us think they is just another, predictable downturn in keeping with the gospel of supply side theory.
Now there is a new"investment" called ETFs. Again, I learned this from my own personal experience. ETFs are funds that “seek to reflect the performance, less expenses,” of some commodity. This way you invest in the fund instead of taking the massive, nearly incomprehensible risks of a futures contract. You like oil, you can buy the ETF for oil and it’s almost like buying the real thing unless your car runs out of gas at which point it is utterly useless. You get the best of both worlds because you get to invest in a commodity but there is no expiration period like in futures and you can trade it like a stock.
The key word here, of course, is “seek.” In this case seek and ye shall not find. Knowing none the better I had the Wall Street brain fart and decided to buy in.
Based on the advisors that I read and trust, this looked like a pretty good investment vehicle to me. Oil, which I fully believed would rebound, was in the proverbial toilet, trading in the $30 to $40 dollar range after peaking at $140 just a few months before. Gold, one of the few investments where you have an asset without a commensurate liability, was in the doldrums trading water. Jim Rogers was pounding the table that silver was a better investment than gold.
So what better way to cherry pick the obvious over-reaction of the market than to go long on the ETFs for these commodities. Long, as you must surely know, means you are expecting the value to go up. What could go wrong?
First, let me dazzle you with my brilliance. On the day that I bought the oil ETF, just under four months ago, the underlying commodity finished the day at $35.30. Today it was $51.00. That is a $15.70 increase in just under four months a 44% increase. Annualized, it comes out to about a 144% gain.
Gold was $897 on the day I bought the gold ETF which is just over two months ago . Today its $952.60. Annualized, it comes out to just under 75%. Silver didn’t fare as well. It was $13.00 when I bought in just over a month ago and only $13.60 right now so I’m only up $0.60. This translates to 55% per year.
Now let me tell you about the Lamborghini and villa on the French Riviera that I am about to buy. Provided I get a bailout or go to work for Goldman Saks.
According to my online broker, having ditched the high priced guys, I would have come out better, much better, with the mattress. Gold, having gone up at the staggering pace of 75% per year ince then, has only yielded a profit in the ETF of 5.25%. And that’s one of the good ones!
Silver popped up at a 55% pace – but I’m showing a gain of 13.81 %. Not terrible, but not at all in accord with the promised land I had believed in at the outset.
Yet the big winner was oil so it will all even itself out. Or so I thought. My oil ETF, my big winner so far with a monster 144% annualized return, is down 12.06%. You read that right – DOWN. If this “seeks” to reflect the performance of actual oil, it fails. - miserably. They all fail big time. While it looks a little better to see green numbers than red numbers, the risks have not been rewarded on a single one of these things. I have guessed right, put my money down, waited for the future to unfold just as I predicted it would, and got screwed.
Oil is now at its highest point since I bought in. It’s been setting new highs almost daily. So how in the name of all things good and holy, can the ETF be DOWN 12%? Let’s face it – 12% is a pretty big loss to swallow when things are going south. Yet it’s hard to believe that, the one thing that has skyrocketed forward is still a loser. Thank God it didn’t go up any more or I could be bankrupt I guess.
From the standpoint of the underlying commodity I should be seeing fantastic returns in each of these. Yet, overall, I am barely breaking even. If that’s the case, then who are the winners? What pocket did my money go into? If you are doing absolutely everything right on a risky investment that promises great returns for the lucky ones, how do you come away with less money than you started with?
There will be plenty of market double speak. The EBIDA of the P/E was misaligned in the short yield curve or some similar nonsense that essentially means “screw you buddy. We’ve got your money and we aren’t giving it back.”
